Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-07

TEJ BAHADUR RAM vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/19001
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
TEJ BAHADUR RAM
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE AR. LAKSHMANAN
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition seeking to extend the retirement age of an employee beyond 58 years, citing Rule 2 of the U.P. State Electricity Board (Employees’ Retirement) Regulations, 1975, which mandates retirement at 58 with limited discretion for extension. The Court clarified that there is no provision allowing individual discretion for extending retirement age, thus affirming the legality of the management's decision. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the statutory retirement age as compliant with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

TEJ BAHADUR RAM vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam