Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-11

MARAGATHAMMAL vs KAMALAMMAL

Citation / case number
SC 2004/21545
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MARAGATHAMMAL
Respondent
KAMALAMMAL
Author
MARKANDEY KATJU
Bench
ASHOK BHAN & MARKANDEY KATJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court's decision regarding eviction under Section 11 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, confirming that the respondent failed to deposit admitted arrears of rent, leading to the striking off of their defense. The Court emphasized that the requirement for timely deposit of rent is crucial for maintaining a defense in eviction proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the eviction order based on the respondent's non-compliance with the Rent Controller's directives.

MARAGATHAMMAL vs KAMALAMMAL · Niyam