Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-29

YEDLA SRINIVASA RAO vs STATE OF A.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/10920
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
YEDLA SRINIVASA RAO
Respondent
STATE OF A.P.
Author
A.K. MATHUR
Bench
A.K. MATHUR & ALTAMAS KABIR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 376 IPC for rape and Section 417 IPC for cheating, affirming the High Court's decision that the prosecutrix was above 16 years of age based on medical evidence. The Court emphasized that consent obtained through deceitful promises of marriage constitutes a violation of the law. The accused's appeal against the conviction was dismissed, reinforcing the legal principle that false promises leading to sexual intercourse can amount to rape under Indian law.

YEDLA SRINIVASA RAO vs STATE OF A.P. · Niyam