Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-08

SURENDRA PRASAD TEWARI vs U.P.RAJYA K.UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD

Citation / case number
SC 2003/25027
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SURENDRA PRASAD TEWARI
Respondent
U.P.RAJYA K.UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI G.P. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of regularization in public employment, emphasizing that contractual appointments do not confer any right to regularization unless explicitly provided by law or policy. The Court held that the appellant's repeated contractual appointments did not establish a legitimate expectation for regularization under Article 14 and Article 16 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that denied the claim for regularization.

SURENDRA PRASAD TEWARI vs U.P.RAJYA K.UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD · Niyam