Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-13

COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. ALLIED AIR CONDITIONING CORPORATION

Citation / case number
SC 2000/21019
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE, DELHI
Respondent
M/S. ALLIED AIR CONDITIONING CORPORATION
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals against a CEGAT judgment regarding the valuation of packaged air conditioners under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the applicability of the extended limitation period under Section 11(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that the valuation must include all components necessary for assembly, and the extended period of limitation was rightly invoked due to mis-declaration by the respondent. The Court upheld the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Commissioner, affirming the CEGAT's remand for fresh consideration on valuation and limitation issues.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE, DELHI vs M/S. ALLIED AIR CONDITIONING CORPORATION · Niyam