Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-15

Arun Kumar & Others vs Union Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 636
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arun Kumar & Others
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Author
C.K. Thakker
Bench
C.K. Thakker, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of Rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, as amended by the Income Tax (Twenty-second) Amendment Rules, 2001, which revised the method for computing the valuation of perquisites under Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the amended Rule 3 was inconsistent with the parent Act and violated Article 14 of the Constitution, thereby quashing the notification and ruling it as ultra vires. The outcome favored the appellants, restoring the previous method of computation for perquisites.

Arun Kumar & Others vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam