Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-05

Amin Chand Payarelal vs Inspecting Asstt. ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 572
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Amin Chand Payarelal
Respondent
Inspecting Asstt. ...
Bench
Ashok Bhan, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision, affirming that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was valid despite the appellant's claim of having paid interest for late filing of returns. The Court clarified that the jurisdiction of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to impose such penalties was not in dispute, and that merely paying interest does not exempt the assessee from penalty obligations. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, maintaining the penalty imposed for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1965-66.

Amin Chand Payarelal vs Inspecting Asstt. ... · Niyam