Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-29

Beed District Central Co-Operative ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 238
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Beed District Central Co-Operative ...
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, specifically Section 4, employees are entitled to gratuity based on completed years of service, with a ceiling limit that can be amended by the employer. The Court found that the respondents, upon retirement, were entitled to the benefits of both the Bank's gratuity schemes and the increased ceiling limit under the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 1998. The Court upheld the decision of the lower authorities in favor of the employees, affirming their entitlement to the higher gratuity amount.

Beed District Central Co-Operative ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors · Niyam