Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-29

Sadashiv Dada Patil vs Purshottam Onkar Patil (D) By Lrs

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 235
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sadashiv Dada Patil
Respondent
Purshottam Onkar Patil (D) By Lrs
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B.Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the provisions of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, particularly Sections 2(2), 2(6), 31, and 32, in the context of tenancy rights and landholder definitions. The Court held that the definitions provided in the Act are crucial for determining the rights of both landlords and tenants, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory notice requirements for tenancy termination. The Court ultimately upheld the rights of the tenants under the Act, reinforcing the legislative intent to protect agricultural tenants.

Sadashiv Dada Patil vs Purshottam Onkar Patil (D) By Lrs · Niyam