Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-29

Moti Lal Saraf vs State Of Jammu & Kashmir & Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 56
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Moti Lal Saraf
Respondent
State Of Jammu & Kashmir & Another
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the right to a speedy trial is an essential part of the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court found that the prosecution of the appellant under Section 5(2) of the Jammu & Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act was invalid due to lack of proper sanction, as the sanctioning authority was not competent to remove the appellant from service. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the proceedings against the appellant, emphasizing that a valid sanction is a prerequisite for prosecution under the Act.

Moti Lal Saraf vs State Of Jammu & Kashmir & Another · Niyam