Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-29

S. Chinnasamy vs Seed Inspector, Coimbatore & Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 109
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. Chinnasamy
Respondent
Seed Inspector, Coimbatore & Another
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, specifically citing Section 7(1)(a)(ii) for conducting seed business without a valid license and failing to maintain necessary records as mandated by the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983. The Court affirmed the lower courts' findings that the appellants violated clauses 3(1), 8(a) and (b), and 18(1) of the Seeds (Control) Order, leading to a sentence of three months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000 each. The judgment reinforces the necessity of compliance with regulatory provisions in the sale of agricultural seeds.

S. Chinnasamy vs Seed Inspector, Coimbatore & Another · Niyam