Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-13

B.S.N.L. & Ors vs M/S. Subash Chandra Kanchan & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3335
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.S.N.L. & Ors
Respondent
M/S. Subash Chandra Kanchan & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically Section 11. The Court held that the appointment of Shri B.C. Bhattacharya as arbitrator by the High Court was valid, as both parties had consented to his appointment, thereby upholding the arbitration clause in the contract. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the agreed arbitration process and the necessity of mutual consent in appointing arbitrators.

B.S.N.L. & Ors vs M/S. Subash Chandra Kanchan & Anr · Niyam