Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-09-11

State Of Gujarat & Ors vs Dilipbhai Shaligram Patil

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3091
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Gujarat & Ors
Respondent
Dilipbhai Shaligram Patil
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that interim orders issued during the pendency of a writ petition cease to have effect upon the final disposal of the petition, as established in Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd. v. U.P. State Electricity Board (1997 (5) SCC 772) and Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. v. Church of South India Trust Association (1992 (3) SCC 1). The Court found the Gujarat High Court's decision to allow the respondent's appeal untenable, emphasizing that reinstatement based on an interim order does not justify relief after the writ petition is dismissed. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's ruling.

State Of Gujarat & Ors vs Dilipbhai Shaligram Patil · Niyam