Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-13

ISHWARCHAND AMICHAND GOVADIA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/3691
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ISHWARCHAND AMICHAND GOVADIA
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the alteration of charges under Section 304B IPC can be made at any stage of the trial, but must consider the relevance of evidence presented, such as death certificates. The Court found that the Bombay High Court erred in dismissing the application for reconsideration of charges without adequately addressing the implications of conflicting medical evidence. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the evidence before framing charges.

ISHWARCHAND AMICHAND GOVADIA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam