Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-19

ANAND HANUMATHSA KATARE vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/12800
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANAND HANUMATHSA KATARE
Respondent
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
C.K. THAKKER ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the detention order under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1985, specifically under Section 3(2) and Section 3(3). The Court ruled that the Detaining Authority's subjective satisfaction was valid despite the detenu's claims regarding the impact on public order and the non-supply of certain documents. The High Court's dismissal of the habeas corpus petition was affirmed, establishing that the Detaining Authority's role continues until the State Government's approval is granted.

ANAND HANUMATHSA KATARE vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE . · Niyam