Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-10

Col. (Retd.) B.J. Akkara vs The Govt. of India & Ors.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/61179
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Col. (Retd.) B.J. Akkara
Respondent
The Govt. of India & Ors.
Author
R. V. RAVEENDRAN G. P. MATHUR
Bench
R. V. RAVEENDRAN G. P. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the calculation of pension for retired Medical, Dental, and Veterinary officers of the Army Medical Corps, ruling that the Non-Practising Allowance (NPA) must be included in the 'reckonable emoluments' for pension calculations as per Ministry Circulars dated 30.10.1987 and 3.2.1998. The Court held that the NPA, treated as pay, is essential for determining the pension of officers who retired before 1.1.1996, thereby ensuring their pension reflects their total emoluments. The judgment affirmed the Ministry's obligation to implement these provisions for pre-1996 pensioners.

Col. (Retd.) B.J. Akkara vs The Govt. of India & Ors. · Niyam