Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-09

STATE REP. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.N. vs A. PARTHIBAN

Citation / case number
SC 2002/16506
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE REP. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.N.
Respondent
A. PARTHIBAN
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of the respondent under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court held that while both sections operate separately, a single act cannot lead to dual convictions under both provisions. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction under Section 13(2) while confirming the conviction under Section 7, and ruled that the provisions of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were applicable, allowing for probation.

STATE REP. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.N. vs A. PARTHIBAN · Niyam