Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-31

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Ravi Prakash Babulalsing Parmar & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 295
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Respondent
Ravi Prakash Babulalsing Parmar & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the jurisdiction of the Caste Scrutiny Committee in relation to the Scheduled Tribes under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976. The Court held that the Committee must adhere to principles of natural justice and give precedence to documentary evidence over oral evidence in caste verification processes. The Court upheld the Bombay High Court's ruling that the Scrutiny Committee lacked the competence to question the caste status of the respondent, thereby reinstating the validity of the caste certificate issued to him.

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Ravi Prakash Babulalsing Parmar & Anr · Niyam