Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-10-17

Rohit Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar (Now State Of Jharkhand) & ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 10
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rohit Singh & Ors
Respondent
State Of Bihar (Now State Of Jharkhand) & ...
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute regarding property rights under the Bihar Land Reforms Act and the Forest Act, 1927. The Court held that the trial court's allowance of third-party intervention under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure was appropriate, as it was necessary for a complete adjudication of the case. The Court emphasized the importance of considering claims of adverse possession and inheritance in property disputes, ultimately affirming the trial court's decision to permit the amendment of the written statement by the defendants claiming long and uninterrupted possession.

Rohit Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar (Now State Of Jharkhand) & ... · Niyam