Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-24

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH vs SURINDER SINGH BANOLTA

Citation / case number
SC 2005/5192
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Respondent
SURINDER SINGH BANOLTA
Author
MARKANDEY KATJU S.B. SINHA
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Article 243B and Article 243O of the Constitution of India establish the framework for the constitution of Panchayats and bar judicial interference in electoral matters related to Panchayats. The Court emphasized that disqualifications for Panchayat membership, as outlined in Section 122 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, must be adhered to, and any disputes regarding disqualifications should be resolved as per the provisions of the Act. The judgment reinforced the supremacy of constitutional provisions in matters of local self-governance and electoral integrity.

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH vs SURINDER SINGH BANOLTA · Niyam