Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-15

SUB. DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P),UHBVNL vs DHARAM PAL

Citation / case number
SC 2004/19113
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUB. DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P),UHBVNL
Respondent
DHARAM PAL
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, affirming that the demand for electricity charges based on alleged tampering was illegal. The Court emphasized the necessity of following the procedure outlined in Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, which mandates a reference to the Electrical Inspector before raising such demands. The Court held that principles of natural justice were violated as no notice was given to the consumer prior to the demand being raised.

SUB. DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P),UHBVNL vs DHARAM PAL · Niyam