Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-30

N.V. SUBBA RAO vs CORPORATION BANK .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/25372
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.V. SUBBA RAO
Respondent
CORPORATION BANK .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE AR. LAKSHMANAN
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the suspension period of an employee can be counted for pension and gratuity purposes under service law. The Court held that since the appellant was reinstated as a clerk after being dismissed, he is entitled to have the suspension period considered for reckoning pension and gratuity benefits. The Court emphasized that the management's refusal to treat the suspension period as service was not justified, thereby allowing the appellant's claim for benefits during the suspension period.

N.V. SUBBA RAO vs CORPORATION BANK . · Niyam