Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-10

STATE OF A.P. vs V. SARMA RAO & ORS. ETC. ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/21889
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF A.P.
Respondent
V. SARMA RAO & ORS. ETC. ETC.
Author
DALVEER BHANDARI S.B. SINHA
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in the context of a complaint regarding a large-scale fraud in land acquisition proceedings. The Court held that the inquiry conducted by the District Judge was permissible under Section 340 CrPC, emphasizing that the High Court's quashing of the complaint was erroneous. The Court reinstated the inquiry, affirming that justice must not only be done but also be seen to be done, thereby allowing the appeal by the State.

STATE OF A.P. vs V. SARMA RAO & ORS. ETC. ETC. · Niyam