Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-01

Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 609
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Manish Ratan & Ors
Respondent
State Of M.P. & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the application of Sections 177 and 178 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case concerning jurisdiction over a dowry harassment complaint. The Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the appellants' revision application, as the allegations of mal-treatment were specific to Jabalpur and did not establish jurisdiction in Datia. The Court distinguished the case from Sujata Mukherjee, emphasizing that the continuing offence doctrine did not apply as there was no evidence of mal-treatment occurring in Datia, thus setting aside the High Court's order.

Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr · Niyam