Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-10

Chief Engineer Of B.P.D.P./R.E.O., ... vs M/S Scoot Wilson Kirpatrick India ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 414
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chief Engineer Of B.P.D.P./R.E.O., ...
Respondent
M/S Scoot Wilson Kirpatrick India ...
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appeal filed under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable, clarifying that this section is analogous to Section 39(1)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court emphasized that an arbitral award can be set aside if the reference to arbitration is void ab initio, as established in Dharma Prathishthanam v. Madhok Construction (P) Ltd. The judgment overturned the High Court's ruling that the appeal was not maintainable, thereby allowing the appeal to proceed.

Chief Engineer Of B.P.D.P./R.E.O., ... vs M/S Scoot Wilson Kirpatrick India ... · Niyam