Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-23

M/S Benara Valves Ltd. & Ors vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 339
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Benara Valves Ltd. & Ors
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which required the appellants to pre-deposit a percentage of the duty and penalties imposed under the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically under Section 35F. The Court emphasized that the discretion to grant stay must be exercised judicially, considering the principles established in previous cases such as Silliguri Municipality v. Amalendu Das and Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision to require pre-deposit before hearing the appeals.

M/S Benara Valves Ltd. & Ors vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & Anr · Niyam