Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-08

Raythara Sahakari Bank Ltd vs Chandrakala R. Das

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 229
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raythara Sahakari Bank Ltd
Respondent
Chandrakala R. Das
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, affirming the State Commission's ruling that the appellant-Bank must compensate the complainant for the pledged gold ornaments at the rate of Rs.573/- per gram, despite the Bank's resolution to pay Rs.410/- per gram. The Court emphasized that the Bank's liability to pay was not negated by the pending insurance claim for the theft. The ruling clarified that consumer rights must be upheld regardless of internal resolutions made by the Bank regarding compensation.

Raythara Sahakari Bank Ltd vs Chandrakala R. Das · Niyam