Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-24

Mohammed Arshad vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 624
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mohammed Arshad
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302/34 IPC, affirming that the dying declarations made by the deceased, Kayyum, were credible and consistent. The Court emphasized that the dying declaration is a vital piece of evidence, especially when corroborated by other testimonies. The appeal was dismissed, and the life imprisonment sentence along with a fine of Rs. 3,000/- was maintained, reinforcing the principle that dying declarations can be the sole basis for conviction if found reliable.

Mohammed Arshad vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam