Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-24

Dilip & Anr vs State Of M.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 369
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dilip & Anr
Respondent
State Of M.P
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the mandatory procedural safeguards under Sections 41, 42, and 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) must be strictly complied with during searches and seizures. The Court found that the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal of the appellants, as the search was conducted without adherence to these statutory requirements, particularly Section 50, which necessitates taking the person to a Gazetted Officer if requested. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the appellants, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures in narcotics cases.

Dilip & Anr vs State Of M.P · Niyam