U.P. State Road Transport Corporation & ... vs Shivaji

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the respondent's services as a driver was not justified, as the domestic inquiry was found to be invalid and the evidence presented did not substantiate the charges of misconduct. The Court emphasized that the barrier involved was not installed by the employer and that the witness's testimony indicated that the bus could have passed without incident. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to reinstate the respondent, finding the termination to be illegal under the principles of natural justice and fair procedure.