Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-10

State Of A.P vs V. Sarma Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 137
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of A.P
Respondent
V. Sarma Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the inquiry conducted by the District Judge regarding alleged fraud in land acquisition was permissible under law. The Court found that the High Court erred in quashing the complaint filed by the District Judge, emphasizing that the inquiry was necessary due to the serious allegations of conspiracy and fraud involving multiple parties. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the inquiry to proceed, affirming the applicability of Section 340 in this context.

State Of A.P vs V. Sarma Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc · Niyam