Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-15

Sub Divisional Officer (P), Uhbvnl vs Dharam Pal

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 1214
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sub Divisional Officer (P), Uhbvnl
Respondent
Dharam Pal
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, affirming that the demand for electricity charges raised by the appellant was illegal due to failure to follow the procedure outlined in Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The Court emphasized that proper notice must be given before raising such demands, aligning with principles of natural justice. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the necessity of rectifying defective meters before imposing charges.

Sub Divisional Officer (P), Uhbvnl vs Dharam Pal · Niyam