Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-11-09

Jagannath Amin vs Seetharama (Dead) By Lrs. And Ors

Citation / case number
2007 (1) SCC 694
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jagannath Amin
Respondent
Seetharama (Dead) By Lrs. And Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the applicability of Section 35(1) of the Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958, in a partition suit concerning agricultural land, rejecting the appellant's argument for Section 35(2) applicability based on deemed market value. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the revision petition, stating that the trial court's conclusion regarding the special requirements of the case was justified. The ruling clarifies the interpretation of court fee provisions in partition suits involving agricultural properties.

Jagannath Amin vs Seetharama (Dead) By Lrs. And Ors · Niyam