Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-19

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS vs G. ANAND RAMAMURTHY .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/12021
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS
Respondent
G. ANAND RAMAMURTHY .
Author
AR. Lakshmanan
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision allowing respondents to sit for the examination, interpreting Rule 7.12 of the National Board of Examinations' eligibility criteria. The Court clarified that the completion of three years of training is a prerequisite for eligibility, but the respondents' training completion date did not preclude their participation in the examination. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the eligibility rules while also considering the context of the respondents' training timelines, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondents' eligibility.

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS vs G. ANAND RAMAMURTHY . · Niyam