Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-05

ANIL KUMAR TULSIYANI vs STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2005/20025
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANIL KUMAR TULSIYANI
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.
Author
R.V.RAVEENDRAN H.K.SEMA
Bench
R.V.RAVEENDRAN H.K.SEMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in granting bail to the respondent accused under Section 302 read with Section 201 IPC, as it failed to consider the gravity and nature of the offence. The Court emphasized that the circumstances surrounding the case, including the incident occurring in the accused's bedroom and the close relationship with the deceased, necessitated a more cautious approach to bail. The Court ultimately set aside the High Court's order, reinforcing the principle that the seriousness of the charges must be a primary consideration in bail decisions.

ANIL KUMAR TULSIYANI vs STATE OF U.P. · Niyam