Sanjay Sitaram Khemka vs State of Maharashtra & Ors.

The Supreme Court addressed the petitioner's claims of defamation and harassment by police and private individuals, emphasizing that the petitioner had adequate legal remedies available, including filing complaints for defamation and harassment in appropriate courts. The Court held that the dismissal of the petitioner's writ petition by the Bombay High Court was justified as he had not exhausted the available remedies. The Court reiterated that the legal framework allows for redressal through established judicial processes rather than through extraordinary writs.