Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-24

ARVINDER SINGH BAINS vs STATE OF PUNJAB .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/8535
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARVINDER SINGH BAINS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB .
Author
AR. Lakshmanan
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's LPA, affirming that the seniority of PCS officers is governed by Rule 21 of the 1976 Rules, which refers to Rule 18 regarding the order of appointment. The Court clarified that delays in filling vacancies do not entitle direct recruits to higher seniority over promotees appointed during that period. The judgment emphasized that seniority must be determined based on the order of appointment as stipulated in the relevant rules, thereby rejecting the appellant's claims for higher placement in the seniority list.

ARVINDER SINGH BAINS vs STATE OF PUNJAB . · Niyam