Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-18

P.S.E.B., PATIALA vs SUDARSHAN PARSHAD

Citation / case number
SC 1999/9241
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.S.E.B., PATIALA
Respondent
SUDARSHAN PARSHAD
Bench
K. G. BALAKRISHNAN & R. V. RAVEENDRAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of House Rent Allowance (HRA) for employees of the Punjab State Electricity Board, specifically regarding the protection of higher HRA rates drawn until 31.8.1988 after a revision effective from 1.9.1988. The Court held that the employees were entitled to retain the higher HRA rates until their revised rates were adjusted, as per the Board's circulars and the classification of cities. The judgment emphasized the need for adherence to the Board's policy on HRA, affirming the employees' rights under the existing terms and conditions.

P.S.E.B., PATIALA vs SUDARSHAN PARSHAD · Niyam