Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-12

Howrah Mills Co. Ltd. & Anr vs Md. Shamin & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 276
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Howrah Mills Co. Ltd. & Anr
Respondent
Md. Shamin & Ors
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be exercised to issue a writ of mandamus for police protection of property, even amidst disputes over ownership. The Court emphasized that the need for protection of the property, especially during the revival process approved by the BIFR, outweighed the claims of co-owners. The Court reinstated the interim order of the Single Judge, affirming the necessity of police assistance to prevent unauthorized interference with the property.

Howrah Mills Co. Ltd. & Anr vs Md. Shamin & Ors · Niyam