Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-01

Mercantile Bank Ltd., Bombay vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bombay ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3667
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mercantile Bank Ltd., Bombay
Respondent
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bombay ...
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two key issues under the Income Tax Act, 1961: (1) whether interest on doubtful advances credited to the interest suspense account is taxable, and (2) the applicability of separate limits for computing disallowance under Section 40A(5) for employees who retire during the previous year. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that interest on sticky loans should not be taxed if the taxpayer can prove the loans are irrecoverable, aligning with the minority opinion in State Bank of Travancore vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. The Court also confirmed that the method of accounting followed by the assessee was consistent with established practices, thus ruling in favor of the appellant on both counts.

Mercantile Bank Ltd., Bombay vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax Bombay ... · Niyam