Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-12

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Karanvir

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2211
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Himachal Pradesh
Respondent
Karanvir
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that for a conviction under Section 409 IPC, the prosecution must prove misappropriation of property entrusted to the accused. In this case, the High Court found that the prosecution failed to establish that the respondent, a Post Master, misappropriated Rs.8,000/- deposited for National Savings Certificates, leading to the quashing of his conviction. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of proving misappropriation beyond reasonable doubt.

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Karanvir · Niyam