Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-18

P. S. E. B., Patiala & Anr vs Sudarshan Parshad & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2185
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. S. E. B., Patiala & Anr
Respondent
Sudarshan Parshad & Ors
Bench
K. G. Balakrishnan, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of House Rent Allowance (HRA) for employees of the Punjab State Electricity Board, specifically regarding the protection of higher HRA rates drawn until 31.8.1988 after a revision effective from 1.9.1988. The Court held that employees who were previously entitled to HRA as applicable to Ludhiana city should continue to receive the higher rates until their revised rates were adjusted, as per the Board's policy and subsequent circulars. The judgment clarified the applicability of HRA based on the place of posting and the classification of cities, affirming the employees' rights to the higher allowances.

P. S. E. B., Patiala & Anr vs Sudarshan Parshad & Ors · Niyam