Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-05-01

State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Nagpur Distillers, Nagpur And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 1987
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Respondent
Nagpur Distillers, Nagpur And Anr
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the interim order of the Bombay High Court regarding the imposition of fees under the Bombay Rectified Spirit (Transport in Bond) Rules, 1951, stating that the State has the exclusive privilege of regulating the manufacture and sale of liquor under Section 49 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The Court clarified that the licensee is obligated to pay the supervisory costs as per Section 58A of the Act. The appeal by the State of Maharashtra was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to challenge the fee structure imposed on the respondents.

State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Nagpur Distillers, Nagpur And Anr · Niyam