Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-03-06

G. AMALORPAVAM vs R.C. DIOCESE OF MADURAI .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/448
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G. AMALORPAVAM
Respondent
R.C. DIOCESE OF MADURAI .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC, affirming that the lower appellate court's judgment did not require explicit points for determination as mandated by Order 41 Rule 31 CPC if there was substantial compliance. The Court clarified that non-compliance does not necessarily render a judgment void, provided the findings can be ascertained. The Court ultimately dismissed the appeals, affirming the decisions of the lower courts.

G. AMALORPAVAM vs R.C. DIOCESE OF MADURAI . · Niyam