Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-03-24

A. Sudhakar vs Post Master General, Hyderabad & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 634
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A. Sudhakar
Respondent
Post Master General, Hyderabad & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision that the imposition of compulsory retirement on the Appellant by the Director of Postal Services was illegal, as the Superintendent of Post Offices was the designated disciplinary authority. The Court found that the Appellant was denied proper opportunity to defend himself during the enquiry, violating the principles of natural justice as outlined in Rules 14(11) and 14(15) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Appellant, reinstating the Tribunal's order.

A. Sudhakar vs Post Master General, Hyderabad & Anr · Niyam