Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-03-08

Rajbir Singh vs State Of U.P. & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 1963
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajbir Singh
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Anr
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
Arun Kumar, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the charges framed under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against Akhilesh Chauhan. The Court emphasized that the intent to kill is not a prerequisite for establishing culpability under the SC/ST Act when the victim belongs to a Scheduled Caste. The Court reinstated the charges, affirming the applicability of the SC/ST Act in cases of violence against members of Scheduled Castes, regardless of the intent behind the act.

Rajbir Singh vs State Of U.P. & Anr · Niyam