Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-03-27

Halwasia Vidya Vihar (Sr.Sec.School) ... vs The Regional Provident Fund ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 1767
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Halwasia Vidya Vihar (Sr.Sec.School) ...
Respondent
The Regional Provident Fund ...
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, affirming the imposition of damages under Section 14(B) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, amounting to Rs.14,50,172/-. The Court established that compliance with the State Government's contributory provident fund scheme does not exempt the appellant from liability under the Act. The Court held that the appellant's argument of no default was insufficient, as the statutory provisions were clear regarding the imposition of damages for non-compliance.

Halwasia Vidya Vihar (Sr.Sec.School) ... vs The Regional Provident Fund ... · Niyam