Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-03-02

State Of Karnataka vs Paramjit Singh And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 1408
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Karnataka
Respondent
Paramjit Singh And Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's ruling that the proviso to Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was unconstitutional as it violated Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution by allowing civil imprisonment without prescribed procedure. The Court clarified that while the main provision of Section 27 remains valid, penalties must be imposed in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The judgment emphasized that the offence under Section 27 can only be tried in criminal courts following due process, thus ensuring the protection of fundamental rights.

State Of Karnataka vs Paramjit Singh And Ors · Niyam