Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-06-20

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Raj Kishore Yadav & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P. & Ors
Respondent
Raj Kishore Yadav & Anr
Bench
Ar.Lakshmanan, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the dismissal order of the respondent, which was based on serious charges proven beyond doubt. The Court emphasized that the High Court's interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is limited, and the findings of the Enquiry Officer should not be disturbed. Consequently, the Supreme Court restored the order of dismissal passed by the Disciplinary Authority, allowing the Civil Appeal.

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Raj Kishore Yadav & Anr · Niyam