Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-28

UTTARANCHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. vs MANSARAM NAINWAL

Citation / case number
SC 2005/27535
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UTTARANCHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.
Respondent
MANSARAM NAINWAL
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the acquittal of the respondent in a criminal trial does not automatically invalidate departmental proceedings or warrant reinstatement, as established in Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. (1999 (3) SCC 679). The Court found that the High Court erred in setting aside the termination order based solely on the criminal acquittal, emphasizing that the disciplinary proceedings were valid and the respondent was given a fair opportunity to defend himself. The Court reinstated the termination order, thereby upholding the decision of the Labour Court.

UTTARANCHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. vs MANSARAM NAINWAL · Niyam